[EVA]Gender/Sex

[Rachel K. Clark]

Michael wrote:

> Regardless, a
> proper proof of the theory would be most helpful.

It's been a speck in the starry sky of my "to-do list", and fairly 
low-priority -- don't hold your breath. My own superficial impression is 
that of nearly unanimous disapproval for the theory (and ones in the same 
family, at that) at the ML, so you might also set your expectations low.

(..."helpful"?)

--Reichu