[EVA] The EoE Situation

[Brendan Jamieson]

I don't believe in moral and ethical relativism. SEELE's means and
ends were both evil and morally bankrupt regardless of how they viewed
themselves or their goals. There needs to be a baseline that
determines a just/noble/moral/ethical concept versus an evil one.
People rarely believe that they are evil themselves, but that doesn't
mean that they aren't. Sure, SEELE truly believed that they were doing
what was best for mankind. But they are horribly misguided.

If someone is so blinded by their own doctrine that they cannot
distinguish between right and wrong then it is up to the people on the
outside, who retain their perspective, to stop them.

-brendan

On 5/4/07, RJN <rjn at beeb.net> wrote:
> But if SEELE's motives were purely scientific in boosting the
> d/evolution of mankind to its ultimate state, can that be considered
> evil, or just amoral?