[EVA] The second angel
mistake at hhs.net
Sun Dec 12 01:02:42 EST 1999
>using the cover up that an Angel contacted Adam during Second
>Impact would be inconsistent.
How bad off was mankind at this point in time? Did they say "end of
humanity" or "destruction of all humanity"? They're quite different in
meaning. The Third Impact, if it dealt as much damage as the Second Impact,
could indeed be enough to destroy enough of mankind to send humanity on a
downward (even more so then before) spiral to their destruction.
>Furthermore, it is fair to say Bochan_bird's translation of the 2nd
>Angel entry in the D&R Theater booklet confirms that the Second Angel
>*does* exist. No?
No, not really. They said it was just a theory... just like anything else
regarding the second angel. Besides, the "2nd Angel would have been found
about the same time as Adam" isn't inconsistent at all. It WOULD have been
found at the same time... or pretended to have been found.
More information about the oldeva