[EVA] 2nd Angel Proof-Theory (2APT)
e.barone at flashnet.it
Sat Apr 1 09:58:11 EST 2000
> Circumstancial and opinionated as the reasons are:
> f) This sort of "telekinesis"
No telekinesis stuff. Telegenesis if you want, but it's not fitting either.
> "Birth" and "growth." Or more specifically, the "growth" or "birth" evident
> in the introduction of a never-before seen entity to the world.
No, it is the growth of an already existing entity. The so called giant Rei is
detected as an human because she is the way for the existing species (human) to
> If Adam *has* to be present (and presumably interacting with the physical
> world in some way beyond merely thinking) in order to allow the process of
> Angel creation to proceed, Adam's ability as an SoL to create matter should
> not be relevant.
But we don't know if he has to...
> That's just you. Few others have thought enough about it to care.
As it is just you for many of the objections you made at the top of the original
> Who cares? The Adam they met in Antarctica certainly wasn't friendly. They
> got the SI going anyways.
He was snoozing, not rampaging around.
> They have satellites to use for exactly this sort of purpose.
Another misunderstanding...I thought you were talking about the timespan of the
millennium during which supposedly Adam could've been around...
> Why wouldn't they?
See just above.
> Irrelevant. Keel, at least, was a successful German industrialist.
See just above.
> Awake but imprisoned, and attempting to find a way out.
You said inert before. But, anyway, aside of the bakelite I see no prison for
him, except maybe kaworu, but again, was kaworu truly manufactured in 2000 or
Emanuele Barone - e.barone at flashnet.it Jobs | |¯ the Mac
-- www.macstep.com -- is at | _ |_ with
More information about the oldeva