[EVA] Lance = S^2 Proof (L=S^2P) [Expanded/New]

[MMKokusaiYK]

>>Is there any non-circumstancial evidence to back [If the Lance contains an S^2, then it is Adam's S^2.] up?

The line from the DEATH/Director's Cut scene.
The Lance was taken from Adam. If it is/has an S^2, then ipso facto it
must be Adam's.

>>You stated: "The Lance is/contains Adam's S^2." 
>>The burden of proof is on you.

You stated first that the Lance could be an Angel, which would require
it to have an S^2, so the burden of proof is also on you. I am more than
willing to drop the L=S^2P for the time being, since my original aim is
the 2APT, which requires the elimination of the Lance as a candidate.
So I ask again: Does the Lance contain an S^2?

>>And yet you can't prove that the Lance doesn't have a soul.

If the Lance has an S^2, then the S^2 is Adam's. In this case it cannot
be an Angel, and would thus not have a soul.
If it does not have an S^2, then again it cannot be an Angel and would
not have a soul.
So which is it?

>>Simply because something comes from Adam and contains an S^2 doesn't 
>>mean that the S^2 contained is *Adam's.*

Oh really? And how would you propose to achieve that?

>>Not only this, the very idea that the Lance contains an S^2 is in 
>>question. Does it?

That is what I am asking you. Do you still say the Lance is the 2nd
Angel? If so, then you are saying that it has an S^2. If not, then we
can end this part of the 2APT and move on.
So which is it?

>>Sure. You can say all you want that *my* case requires the Lance to 
>>contain an S^2. However, you'll note that the topic of discussion is 
>>"Lance = S^2 Proof," and the fact that we're currently trying to 
>>ascertain the validity of this proof.

And I have also said that the L=S^2P is merely incidental to the 2APT,
and can be dropped if not necessary.
So which is it?

Bochan_bird