[EVA] Lance = S^2 Proof (L=S^2P) [Expanded/New]
bochan at fuji.ne.jp
Sun Apr 9 11:26:15 EDT 2000
>No. Said in a different way, "Adam 'provided' the Angels."
>>I will restate my case once more. <snip>
Evasion of the question.
>>To the contrary. I *will* back down given that you have sufficient
>>evidence to back your case.
To the contrary, you have proven repeatedly through twisted semantics,
forced ambiguity and not-a-shred-of-proof theories that you won't.
>>Except for the fact that there's evidence against the above examples,
>>proving them, to an extent, false. In the case of the Lance being/not
>>being the 2nd Angel, such evidence has yet to appear.
Really? Can you provide this conclusive evidence?
No? I didn't think so. This application of different standards to your
arguments (conclusive proof required) and others' arguments ("to an
extent" is enough) is intellectually dishonest, and just reinforces the
idea that further debate is pointless.
AKAIK, this debate is over.
More information about the oldeva