[EVA] A picture is worth a thousand words.

[Brendan Jamieson]

ShinjiOO1 at aol.com wrote:
>http://centraldogma.homestead.com/EvaMLReference.html

I think this is a broken link... So I cannot respond to your points in
this message.
Still...
 
>but if this were a picture of Lilith and Adam combined, why would Lilith be crucified? 

As I said, it seems to me that the image has Lilith crucified with Adam
dangling upside down below her (the second being is not nailed to the
cross, but is definately on it...). I'll outline this more tomorrow.
(also, is it just me - or is the cross lying ontop of something?)

Also I'll try to have an mpeg of this cut uploaded tomorrow for anyone
to d/l and view for themselves. You'll notice that it's a continuous
pan, and that the two being *are* connected. Something that theses still
images simply cannot convey properly.

>I think there is an upside down Lilith in it as symbolism of Rei's relation 
>to Lilith. 

But that does not account for the other image. The arms of which are
both present, but not nailed to the cross. This is a new drawing, and
not simply the standard Lilith image on top of the same pic inverted.

Furthermore, how do you account for the extended torso? I know that
there is a Rei image (with bent legs) behind the lower figure (the
definite Lilith), but there is a vainy texture to them that is missing
from the same Rei image that is by the other figure's right shoulder...

---

>And it clearly shows JUST Lilith on a cross, with some Rei parts obscuring the view.

But the other figure *is* there.

-brendan, and now - sleep.