R: [EVA] A.T fields and satan ^_^
e.barone at flashnet.it
Wed Feb 2 09:45:11 EST 2000
> But for the entire quote, I was talking about the ATF's the Eva's use for
> combat....the ones that we see.
It is a very uncertain field of discussion, but I'd say that they are very
tightly related (otherwise there wouldn't be that control on the pilots'
> Right. If you think about it enough, the whole thing does relate to ATF's,
> in one way or another.
If *I* think about it, yes. But I meant to say that it looked like you
thought that the author wanted to parallel Eva's ATFs with his theory.
> Really? Did I commit a terrible faux pas? Are there rules about what I can
> and can't analyze?
Did I say "Your opinion is against the rules"?
> The quote went right along with the rest of the article,
> so why couldn't it be mentioned in mine? ...Maybe it was
> over-analyzation....so sue me (on second thought, don't ^_^)
> Perhaps I should of have added a "....^_^", it was intended as a joke. Ha
> ha... ha... >:-(
Again, read above the line about the parallel. In that POV, it didn't look
like a joke. I see no reason wh you shouldn't have drawn a parallel if you
wanted to, but I'd have a lot to disagree with it.
Emanuele Barone - e.barone at flashnet.it Jobs | |¯ the Mac
-- www.macstep.com -- is at | _ |_ with
More information about the oldeva