[EVA] Adam-Lilith, quite a few spoliers in the long answer

[MMKokusaiYK]

> I should probably refrain from applying the razor, even if just because a)I'm
> not familiar with it and b)I hate that kind of thing.

and c) it points toward Lilith...  :P


> Meaning to say, if we are to answer yes to the question "is Adam the 1st angel"
> since it is canon info, we should also accept that Adam and Lilith are the same
> source of life?
> Perhaps it is a mistake on my part, but if we are to consider them as the same
> SOL, shouldn't what has come from One of them also have come from the other?
> Shouldn't therefore Lilim and angels come from both Adam and Lilith at the same
> time?

Okay, I think this is where the misunderstanding lies.
The Japanese does not say that they are the same [sole/only] (douitsu) source of
life.  The wording is such that they are the same [type of] (onaji) source of
life.  This fits with the idea that they may have once been a single joined entity
(ie: Kabbalah) which then split into roughly equal and opposite halves and then
spawned their respective races.


> It may be so. If all that supports the "Lilith is not an angel at all" theory is
> proven wrong, then I'd say she'd fit the place.

I am not aware of anything that supports (much less proves) the "Lilith is not an
angel at all" theory.

Bochan_bird