[EVA][META] 2nd Coming??

[Sebastian Palm]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Brendan Jamieson" <bjamieson1 at yahoo.com>
To: <evangelion at eva.onegeek.org>
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 7:42 PM
Subject: RE: [EVA][META] 2nd Coming??


> --- Eduardo_Páez_Trujillo <edpaez at terra.com.pe> wrote:
> ##This ML had a high standard of content,
> ##and I don't think that that should be ignored
> ##simply for the sake of 'something is better
> ##than nothing'. IMHO.
> >Really? And where is that content now?
>
> *blink*
>
> In the ML Archives...? :P

Which, IIRC, are not that easy to find.


> And if you're using the lack of traffic in this ML as
> an excuse to go off on tangents about fan-fics and
> such, see the second part of that segment you quoted.
>
> Just because there's not much discussion here anymore
> doesn't mean the ML policies no longer apply. Again -
> in my opinion. I have no real authority to do anything
> about it. I'm just pointing out that when this ML
> *was* the premiere Evangelion discussion group, a
> thread like this would have been nipped as soon as it
> went off-topic, either officially by Tom - or
> unofficially by other members requesting it be
> dropped.
>
> It's about quality over quantity.

How exactly _do_ you judge quality if there is no quantity? Zero really good
posts are still zero posts, which equals a signal to noise-ratio of 0%.

Did you know that this list has recieved, in the last three days, almost as
many messages as the EFML and FFML have over the last two weeks?

SP