[EVA] [METASPAM] Regarding recent discussion substitute

Archer archer at senet.com.au
Tue Mar 26 21:13:09 EST 2002


I've tagged my two cents on the latest round of banality so those who
are primarily interested in Eva discussion can delete without reading.
I would suggest that all replies to the GoS thread should have been
also tagged accordingly. With the low use of list bandwidth these days
I personally don't care if arguments occasionally flare up, as long as the
rules about tagging are followed, because it's really quite easy (as Widya
demonstrated).

Please don't be afraid to call spam [SPAM]. ^_^




More information about the oldeva mailing list