[EVA] Re: Otakon (Rules?)
immano at katamail.com
Wed Dec 2 13:58:16 EST 2009
> Do you expect anyone to dig through archives in the hopes that there are
> established rules? Besides, the archives are all fucked up. They go back
> to 1980, before Evangelion or Gainax even existed.
Even if it weren't about the rules, it's still about spamming.
> Don't cite non-existent rules. It's not going to accomplish anything.
> Not now, not ever. If you're going to hold people to some behavioral
> framework, then they need to be aware of what that is.
I notice you take an antagonistic stance on this as though I had somehow
insulted you or in any way. Now, while the list rules *do* state, if
(magnetic) memory serves, that "All messages should in some way be
appropriate to Evangelion. It's ok to discuss other things (within
reason, of course), but try not to go overboard", this shouldn't really
need to be written down, should it? It's common sense.
Again, this is not specificly directed to *you*, nor meant to *annoy*
you, it's just to get back to something that is relevant to everybody
and not just a few.
Now, because I had sent this message to induce a stop to this thread and
not to participate in it, I will stop replying. Please do not take this
as a personal slight or anything of the sort. If you wish, this too may
continue in private form, but as far as I'm concerned, it's off the list.
Ebj - immano at katamail.com Jobs | |¯ the Mac
is at | _ |_ with
More information about the evangelion