Komm, Susser Tod ( was Re: [EVA])
fire_drake at rocketmail.com
Mon May 25 15:12:05 EDT 1998
*sigh* Let the plate slinging begin...
---Gareth Ortiz <gao203 at is7.nyu.edu> wrote:
> >>Because Lillith CREATED the Angels, which means she came Before them
> >>and is seprate from them. Lillith is the Source of Life, and is not
> >>an Apposile or an Archangel. Lillith is NOT an Angel, can not be an
> >>Angel. Lillith CREATED the Angels (how many times have I said
> >>and therefor can not have created herself. Lillith created ADAM, so
> >>can't have come after him. Adam, according to the RED CROSS BOOK,
> >>bible of Eva, IS THE FIRST ANGEL, and since Lillith came BEFORE
> >>Lillith can NOT be the Second Angel.
> >Fire Drake wrote this.It has clearly said that Lillith is the first
> >and Adam is the second angel.
He means that I am wrong. I think that's what threw you; he was
disputing me, not using me as support.
> Let's see, Fire Drake wrote: "Because Lillith CREATED the Angels,
> means she came Before them and is seprate from them." And Fire Drake
> wrote: "Lillith is the Source of Life, and is not an Apposile or an
> Archangel. Lillith is NOT an Angel, can not be an Angel." and
> Fire Drake wrote: " Adam, according to the RED CROSS BOOK, the bible
> Eva, IS THE FIRST ANGEL."
> So I ask you... how can you quote what Fire Drake wrote and yet
> miss the point?
No, he's saying I'm wrong.
> No offense to Fire Drake,
None taken. ^_^
> >Okay,here is another prove,go to the following page:
> >http://rossman.simplenet.com/evaangels.html and it will explain why
> >Lillith the first angel.
> sigh... didn't I tell you earlier not to point people towards
> with incorrect information? (of which this one basically could count
To expound, Shinji, the page is WRONG. Thank you, I've said my bit.
Tashi Nagato, who is just about ready to stop caring...
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the oldeva