Looks cool?, was Re: [EVA] why on cross? (22' spoiler)

Oska Archer archer at senet.com.au
Sun Jan 24 21:30:59 EST 1999

At 12:27 AM 24/01/99 PST, you wrote:

>to understand the physics of AT fields. This was just an observation, 
>and the entire point of stating it was that SOMEBODY had to at least 
>know of the ideas I stated when designing. Yeah, it looked cool. 

I can accept that. One (or more) of the designers was influenced, perhaps
by some CG of an imaginary black hole or something...

>Certainly. And GAINAX chose this specific design for the effects of the 
>Lance to put into the show, of all the possible ones. Why?

Why not?

>What do you 

I'd like to see this list one day.

I think this argument is comfortably finished, since I asked why the new
Lance sequence *must* serve any other purpose other than to look cool, and
your response is to theorise about GAiNAX's design procedures and ask me
why they didn't use any other as-far-as-we-know imaginary design.

Oska Archer, an Operative of the Adelaide Japanese Animation Society
http://www.senet.com.au/~archer	:
			Karma, The Three Colours, Daughter of Elysium
 "Iin ja nai no, waaa-KAIN dakara!" - Misato, Eva Addition Drama ^_^

More information about the oldeva mailing list